Andrew Jackson vs William Wirt
Andrew Jackson vs William Wirt in 1832: electoral votes, popular vote and every state, side by side.
Andrew Jackson
- Elections
- 3 (1824, 1828, 1832)
- Won
- 2
- Electoral votes, all runs
- 496
- Best popular vote
- 56.1% in 1828
- Parties
- Democratic, Democratic-Republican
William Wirt
- Elections
- 1 (1832)
- Won
- 0
- Electoral votes, all runs
- 7
- Best popular vote
- 7.8% in 1832
- Parties
- Anti-Masonic
- Andrew Jackson states
- 16
- William Wirt states
- 1
- Popular vote
- 54.2% – 7.8%
Every state, 1832
| State | Andrew Jackson | William Wirt | Gap (pts) | EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 100.0% 7 | — | — | 7 |
| Connecticut | 34.3% | 10.4% | 23.9 | 8 |
| Delaware | 49.0% | — | — | 3 |
| Georgia | 100.0% 11 | — | — | 11 |
| Illinois | 68.0% 5 | 0.5% | 67.5 | 5 |
| Indiana | 55.4% 9 | 0.0% | 55.4 | 9 |
| Kentucky | 45.5% | — | — | 15 |
| Louisiana | 61.7% 5 | — | — | 5 |
| Maine | 54.7% 10 | 1.4% | 53.3 | 10 |
| Maryland | 50.0% 3 | — | — | 8 |
| Massachusetts | 20.6% | 21.7% | -1.1 | 14 |
| Mississippi | 100.0% 4 | — | — | 4 |
| Missouri | 100.0% 4 | — | — | 4 |
| New Hampshire | 56.8% 7 | — | — | 7 |
| New Jersey | 49.9% 8 | 1.0% | 48.9 | 8 |
| New York | 52.1% 42 | — | — | 42 |
| North Carolina | 84.8% 15 | — | — | 15 |
| Ohio | 51.3% 21 | 0.3% | 51.0 | 21 |
| Pennsylvania | 57.7% 30 | 42.3% | 15.4 | 30 |
| Rhode Island | 35.7% | 14.3% | 21.4 | 4 |
| South Carolina | — | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | 95.4% 15 | — | — | 15 |
| Vermont | 24.3% | 40.5% 7 | -16.2 | 7 |
| Virginia | 75.0% 23 | 0.0% | 75.0 | 23 |
Questions and answers
Who won between Andrew Jackson and William Wirt in 1832?
Andrew Jackson won the presidency. Electoral votes: Andrew Jackson 219, William Wirt 7. Popular vote: Andrew Jackson 54.2%, William Wirt 7.8%.
How many states did Andrew Jackson and William Wirt each win in 1832?
Andrew Jackson carried 16 and William Wirt carried 1.
Official results As published by The American Presidency Project (UC Santa Barbara) and the state documents it links. How we use this data